Evidence over assumptions
See how your workloads compare to AWS best practices across six pillars.
Find the risks. Fix what matters first.
We assess your AWS workloads against the Well-Architected Framework — then help you remediate the findings.
Tell us about your AWS workload. We’ll discuss scope, risks and next steps.
Know what’s working, where risk sits, and what to fix first.
See how your workloads compare to AWS best practices across six pillars.
High and medium risk issues prioritised for security, cost and reliability.
We don’t stop at a report — our engineers can implement the fixes.
A structured assessment of a defined AWS workload against the Well-Architected Framework — architecture, operations and design trade-offs.
Security, reliability, performance, cost, operations and sustainability — scored against AWS best practice.
How you deploy, operate, monitor and improve workloads.
How you protect data, systems and cloud resources.
Whether the workload recovers cleanly from failure.
Whether services and resources match demand.
Whether spend is visible, controlled and valuable.
Whether the architecture avoids wasted resources.
A focused review of a defined workload — not a vague scan of everything in AWS.
Scope the system, accounts, users and dependencies that matter.
Review IAM, networking, compute, data, security and observability.
Document decisions and recommendations with AWS’s standard process.
Classify High and Medium Risk Issues by business impact.
Clear engineering actions with priority, risk and expected outcome.
Walk stakeholders through risks, trade-offs and next steps.
After the review, our engineers can remediate with your teams — under your change control.
IAM, encryption, secrets, monitoring and network controls.
Redundancy, backups, recovery and fault-tolerant design.
Right-sizing, caching, autoscaling and bottleneck fixes.
Remove waste, apply pricing models and budget controls.
IaC, CI/CD, logging, alerting and deployment controls.
Managed, containerised or serverless where it adds value.
Six clear stages from scoping to validated improvement.
Align on system, users, criticality and outcomes.
Assess against the six pillars and document risk.
Workshop risks, impact and remediation options.
Agree immediate actions vs accepted risk.
Ship approved changes with controlled delivery.
Confirm fixes and plan ongoing improvement.
Structured results across pillars and lenses.
Strengths, gaps and improvement opportunities.
Sequenced plan for highest-impact fixes.
Scoped engineering work to resolve findings.
Shared view of risks, trade-offs and next steps.
Diagrams and docs for the remediated design.
Especially valuable at these moments:
We review infrastructure and the software that runs on it.
Design, build, test and deploy remediation in your AWS account.
Certified specialists across architecture, DevOps, security and CloudOps.
Improve what matters most — not redesign everything.
No. It’s an architecture review, not a regulatory or penetration-test engagement — though it often surfaces security gaps.
No. Reviews work during design, pre-launch, post-migration or on live workloads.
No. Assessment and remediation are separate. Changes start only after you approve scope.
Yes. Remediation can target High Risk Issues, a pillar, a budget or a phased roadmap.
Yes. We assess the workload against AWS best practices, whoever built it.
Helpful, not required. Discovery and documentation can be part of the engagement.
Yes — when code affects reliability, performance, security, deployment or cost.
We validate improvements and can track resolved risks against the workload over time.
Don’t wait for an outage or surprise bill. Assess the risks — then fix them with confidence.